Interaction in the classroom: Assessment

So i was thinking about “standards” for self assessment after jotting down an anecdote that Daniel Pink mentioned in his interview with Steve Hargadon in tonight´s Elluminate session.. The point Mr. Pink made was that, sometimes students asses their own progress more critically than teachers do!

After considering some personal doubts regarding the validity of my personal goals and how reasonable they are... i decided to try and chart all the types of evaluation that generally occur in the classroom...

i started with these six:

Teachers evaluate:

- student interaction with the content

- their own interaction with the content

- their own interaction with the students

Students evaluate:

- their own interaction with the content

- their own interaction with the teacher

- the way the teacher interacts with the content

[see fig 1 left: T=teacher S=student C=content]

One of the interesting things about this over simplified diagram is that it demonstrates the symmetry of the relationship between student and teacher. Although many of these processes aren´t taken into consideration in most cases, by either student or teacher (and by extension their respective institution) i imagine that they do occur...

The other thing that occurred to me is that, although its nice to imagine that both student and teacher share responsibility for tracking learning progress... it would probably only make sense in high school or at least in college/university contexts... but whereas in kindergarten the relationship is most likely to be productive in a hierarchical format, as the student continues his/her education, the opportunity presents itself for a shift in the traditional “power structure”, gradually conferring more responsibility for this aspect of education onto the students themselves... and in that way allowing for more authentic communication between learners.

After looking at fig 2* (above) for a while, it dawned on me that there are really three “objects” that are the focus of constant scrutiny in the classroom... which led me to redraw the diagram in a this way... [* in this diagram i just flattened all six interactions from fig 1 into one...]

If we imagine that each of the dotted lines in fig 3 (above) are interactions (communaction of sorts) the relationship inside the classroom clearly becomes much more dynamic than the traditional model would imply... [see fig 4 below]

In a very real sense, students have traditionally been disregarded as observers of their own progress/reality... a situation which distorts their role in the classroom, and cuts off many valuable opportunities for interaction among both participants. As far as i can tell, assessment has always been considered an integral part of learning... So my questions are ¿at what point does learning to evaluate learning overshadow content learning? ¿are assessment and learning really the separate actions we typically think of them as?

http://travel.webshots.com/photo/1311396300066992936aivlet

Assesing learning in collaborative environments

I recently, about half an hour ago, listened to an hour long pod cast ( http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2009/02/05/individual-assessment-in-a-collaborative-world/ ) about the challenges of assessing individual student progress in collaborative learning environments, hosted by the Center for Teaching Excellence.

It seems like there is a great deal of speculation regarding what works and how it should be implemented.  Among the most notable (according to me, a student) points were:

• 1. student/teacher colaboration on the definition of evaluation criteria
• 2. maintaining an open dialogue between teacher and students throughout the course
• 3. the importance of self evaluation by giving students time to reflect upon their own work
• 4. demonstrating by some means what top quality work can look like by showing work done by previous students in certain cases
• 5. incorporating peer feedback in the assesment of individual student´s work
• 6. the creation and maintenance of a portfolio which more clearly tracks progress, establishing concrete links to past works throughout a longer period of time
  

As a design student, i´ve been fortunate in having some experience with a few of these evaluation methods... due to the nature of the discipline [of design] itself which provides room for creative thought, self critique, peer critique and feedback to name just a few... although I can´t be sure just how much of each of these are taken into account in the final grade by each teacher...

However, as i was thinking about the challenge of assessing student´s progress, it ocurred to me that there might be other methods which could be considered as well...  

I. Evaluating the questions each student asks...

This may sound rather strange at first, but hopefully I´ll be able to clear that up...

Earlier this evening I skimmed over another post ( http://www.teach42.com/2009/02/12/its-not-an-assignment-its-a-creative-brief/ ) entitled "It´s not an assignment, it´s a creative brief" once again echoing the parrallel between the teaching/learning process and design methodology... 

Which led me to think about the some ideas i had played around with a few months ago... how learning starts with just one question... a question that interests me... one that i would be willing to explore, which would give me the freedom to experiment with new content and discover something which would most likely lead to more questions... 

here´s a simplified diagram of the process in broad strokes:

Question #1 -> Experiment -> Discover -> Question #2, etc... 

basically generating a sustainable loop of personalized learning... 

I imagine having a list of questions, from the first to the last... demonstrating the sequence by which i arrived at the final result... in real world terms this means, that at the begining of the semester, i would start with question #1 and throughout the course of the semester would continue recording my questions in the order they came, till getting to number 100# for example (although its probable that the number could be considerably higher depending on the situation, which could also be part of the evaluation criteria...) 

So... by demonstrating that the last 20 questions are markedly more precise or complex than the first 20 questions, and by comparing this complexity to the results of the individual student´s work or colaborations, the teacher could theoretically make a more clear determination of that student´s progress

the other thought that occurred to me was...

II. Evaluating the relevance of a student´s ideas...

This one sounds less reasonable than the first, although there are some instances in which it could be applied at certain stages during the learning process...

Part of the design process involves finding references and precedents in areas relating to the main topic of the project, which allow the designer to create a solid foundation upon which to construct his/her solution... 

When looking back on the project, it should be clear which elements from the final result were extrapolated from these initial references... and as the investigation phase of the project runs in parrallel to much of its development, these coincidences could be used as benchmarks in determining project progress...

In other words, the later stages of any work should be related in some way to earlier stages by some landmark object, whether it be an image, a sample of text, video, podcast, etc... or even another idea originally created by someone else... the key being that these landmark influences be recorded in such a manner that they may be called upon later as evidence of foundation, proof that the student´s idea is related to some previously relevant content.

Both these methods can be accomplished, i think,  if a carefull log of progress is kept throughout the activity, be it in the form of a diary, video, notebook, audio recording etc... (or a combination of all the aforementioned) although it would requiere a shift from traditional note taking strategies which focus mainly on external information to more personalized analysis and reflection of that content, emphasizing a student´s interaction with the information rather than the focusing on the transference of content itself.